<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.4" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Democratisation of Book Selling?</title>
	<link>http://www.sixtysecondview.com/?p=285</link>
	<description>Sixty second interviews from pr, media and politics</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 15:21:58 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.4</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Jaminaxy</title>
		<link>http://www.sixtysecondview.com/?p=285#comment-74998</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Feb 2008 10:43:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.sixtysecondview.com/?p=285#comment-74998</guid>
					<description>Power Purchase money Describe each response &lt;a href="http://feature.forex-trader-trading.com/Map.htm" rel="nofollow"&gt;bridging seminar affiliate wholesale from home online&lt;/a&gt; lighter products that given data money It knows what tedious undiversified uniformity.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Power Purchase money Describe each response <a href="http://feature.forex-trader-trading.com/Map.htm" rel="nofollow">bridging seminar affiliate wholesale from home online</a> lighter products that given data money It knows what tedious undiversified uniformity.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Jaminaxy</title>
		<link>http://www.sixtysecondview.com/?p=285#comment-74947</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Feb 2008 09:19:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.sixtysecondview.com/?p=285#comment-74947</guid>
					<description>Particular location can performance metrics (PPM all homebusiness any other http://paperback.forex-news-rss.com/Map.htm or  confused money within each The table below!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Particular location can performance metrics (PPM all homebusiness any other <a href='http://paperback.forex-news-rss.com/Map.htm' rel='nofollow'>http://paperback.forex-news-rss.com/Map.htm</a> or  confused money within each The table below!
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Arravy</title>
		<link>http://www.sixtysecondview.com/?p=285#comment-73416</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Feb 2008 10:40:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.sixtysecondview.com/?p=285#comment-73416</guid>
					<description>Hi all. Cool site &lt;a href="http://www.bugooglei.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;Google&lt;/a&gt; 
Thank.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi all. Cool site <a href="http://www.bugooglei.com" rel="nofollow">Google</a><br />
Thank.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: blending the mix &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Are Waterstones missing the point? Community is where it&#8217;s at.</title>
		<link>http://www.sixtysecondview.com/?p=285#comment-31717</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jun 2007 14:33:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.sixtysecondview.com/?p=285#comment-31717</guid>
					<description>[...] David Brain points to an incredible story in The Times about how, many (if not all) the books we see in Waterstone&#8217;s window and &#8220;Hot Points&#8221; are paid-for places. Paid for by the publishers themselves - up to £45,000 a time. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] David Brain points to an incredible story in The Times about how, many (if not all) the books we see in Waterstone&#8217;s window and &#8220;Hot Points&#8221; are paid-for places. Paid for by the publishers themselves - up to £45,000 a time. [&#8230;]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: David Brain</title>
		<link>http://www.sixtysecondview.com/?p=285#comment-30052</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jun 2007 16:21:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.sixtysecondview.com/?p=285#comment-30052</guid>
					<description>That is a very good point I missed Heather.  I wonder if the others do the same?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That is a very good point I missed Heather.  I wonder if the others do the same?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Heather Yaxley</title>
		<link>http://www.sixtysecondview.com/?p=285#comment-30050</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jun 2007 16:15:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.sixtysecondview.com/?p=285#comment-30050</guid>
					<description>I don't really have an issue with Waterstone's charging for prominent positions in-store, after all the big supermarkets do that all the time.  

However, selling "recommendations" seems much less ethical.  One would expect that "paperback of the year" involved some kind of objective assessment rather than buying your way onto a list.  Similarly, the reviews are normally presented as editorial decisions as opposed to adverts.

The selling of a recommendation undoubtedly affects the credibility of suggestions by Waterstone's.  If I remember correctly, wasn't its original brand built on the value of endorsement from staff who were informed about books?  

If I cannot trust that I am going to get a good read, or a valued present, as a result of advice from Waterstone's, then their brand becomes diminished - I may just as well find the book cheaper at Tesco or online.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t really have an issue with Waterstone&#8217;s charging for prominent positions in-store, after all the big supermarkets do that all the time.  </p>
<p>However, selling &#8220;recommendations&#8221; seems much less ethical.  One would expect that &#8220;paperback of the year&#8221; involved some kind of objective assessment rather than buying your way onto a list.  Similarly, the reviews are normally presented as editorial decisions as opposed to adverts.</p>
<p>The selling of a recommendation undoubtedly affects the credibility of suggestions by Waterstone&#8217;s.  If I remember correctly, wasn&#8217;t its original brand built on the value of endorsement from staff who were informed about books?  </p>
<p>If I cannot trust that I am going to get a good read, or a valued present, as a result of advice from Waterstone&#8217;s, then their brand becomes diminished - I may just as well find the book cheaper at Tesco or online.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Paul Fabretti</title>
		<link>http://www.sixtysecondview.com/?p=285#comment-30009</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jun 2007 13:36:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.sixtysecondview.com/?p=285#comment-30009</guid>
					<description>Hey David, I've had a little time to reflect - having to go and sign-on at the Job Centre does that to you!

Your point about it being the only valid business model is a good one. Taking this point further, it actually occurred to me that bricks and mortar retailers (such as Waterstones) may actually be too scared to enter into any alternative business models for fear of failure.

I think most people can safely see that to take amazon on at their own game would be a risky model on which to base your future plans, so maybe they are having to pursue the only business model which a) they know and are comfortable with and b)provides them with any sort of revenue.

I firmly believe that they have an opportunity to establish a business by creating the community first. How many businesses would give their right arm for customers who spend up to an hour in their store?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey David, I&#8217;ve had a little time to reflect - having to go and sign-on at the Job Centre does that to you!</p>
<p>Your point about it being the only valid business model is a good one. Taking this point further, it actually occurred to me that bricks and mortar retailers (such as Waterstones) may actually be too scared to enter into any alternative business models for fear of failure.</p>
<p>I think most people can safely see that to take amazon on at their own game would be a risky model on which to base your future plans, so maybe they are having to pursue the only business model which a) they know and are comfortable with and b)provides them with any sort of revenue.</p>
<p>I firmly believe that they have an opportunity to establish a business by creating the community first. How many businesses would give their right arm for customers who spend up to an hour in their store?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: David Brain</title>
		<link>http://www.sixtysecondview.com/?p=285#comment-29710</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jun 2007 15:58:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.sixtysecondview.com/?p=285#comment-29710</guid>
					<description>I thought it was odd, but only in the sense of lost opportunity.  Surely, they will sell more if they listen as you suggest and promote those backed by their customers or staff?  I guess, the trade off (and they work on thin margins) is the cash for being front of house vs the extra profit from more sales if they promoted books more likely to be popular.  I'm always leery to blast away though, when I see someohting like this, as sometimes we cannot kow the business models and issues faced on the inside.  Maybe it is a dying business model?  Are you calm again?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought it was odd, but only in the sense of lost opportunity.  Surely, they will sell more if they listen as you suggest and promote those backed by their customers or staff?  I guess, the trade off (and they work on thin margins) is the cash for being front of house vs the extra profit from more sales if they promoted books more likely to be popular.  I&#8217;m always leery to blast away though, when I see someohting like this, as sometimes we cannot kow the business models and issues faced on the inside.  Maybe it is a dying business model?  Are you calm again?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Paul Fabretti</title>
		<link>http://www.sixtysecondview.com/?p=285#comment-29705</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jun 2007 15:48:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.sixtysecondview.com/?p=285#comment-29705</guid>
					<description>I am absolutely astounded by this David!

If this were happening on the internet, Waterstones may as well shut up shop.

I can't help thinking it draws parralels to the (apologies for this!) Wal-Mart blogging "scandal" a couple of years back.

The force-feeding of recommendations caused a riot. 

There surely has to be a danger if this story goes viral, that those online retailers promoting books legitimately need to come out and say so. Those that don't have to legitimately explain why. These revelations have the power to undermine a whole industry (or at least one of its sales channels).

There surely has to be an opportunity for book shops to engage with communities (or focus groups at a push!) by creating book clubs that would review books for them. The end result ends up on display. Engaging with the book-buying community, bringing yourself closer to the customer is surely going to create a more positive brand image as well as providing more consumer insight than a random survey might!

I am going for a calming 10 minute break now!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am absolutely astounded by this David!</p>
<p>If this were happening on the internet, Waterstones may as well shut up shop.</p>
<p>I can&#8217;t help thinking it draws parralels to the (apologies for this!) Wal-Mart blogging &#8220;scandal&#8221; a couple of years back.</p>
<p>The force-feeding of recommendations caused a riot. </p>
<p>There surely has to be a danger if this story goes viral, that those online retailers promoting books legitimately need to come out and say so. Those that don&#8217;t have to legitimately explain why. These revelations have the power to undermine a whole industry (or at least one of its sales channels).</p>
<p>There surely has to be an opportunity for book shops to engage with communities (or focus groups at a push!) by creating book clubs that would review books for them. The end result ends up on display. Engaging with the book-buying community, bringing yourself closer to the customer is surely going to create a more positive brand image as well as providing more consumer insight than a random survey might!</p>
<p>I am going for a calming 10 minute break now!
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
